Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
Thyroid  (Expert Forum)
 | 
Is radioactive iodine really safe?
Answered by
Mark Lupo, M.D. - Thyroid Nodules, Thyroid Cancer, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, Thyroid Ultrasound
Thyroid & Endocrine Center of Florida Sarasota - FL
Questions in the Thyroid forum are answered by Dr. Mark Lupo. Topics covered include goiter, graves disease, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, hyperthyroid, hypothyroid, thyroid cancers, thyroiditis, and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH).

Is radioactive iodine really safe?

by tanlis, May 25, 2007 12:00AM
I'm 22 years old and I've had Graves disease for about 5 years now. I'm married and a mother of a 14 month old. The doctor I see keeps telling me that after five years and no signs of the disease going away my next options are to continue to take my meds for the rest of my life or radioactive iodine. I plan to have at least one more baby. I'm still young and feel too young to go through something like that. Should I go for it?

by Mark Lupo, M.D., May 28, 2007 12:00AM
This is one of the toughest Graves questions we face.

The textbook answer is treat with I-131 and wait 12 months (or AT LEAST 6 MONTHS) to try for next pregnancy.  The rationale is that it is easier to control the thyroid once the I-131 ablation is done, and this will result in more stable levels during pregnancy and avoid exposing the baby to anti-thyroid drugs like PTU or Tapazole.  In this case, you would need to be away from the 14mo old for several days because of the radiation safety issues.

The other option is to continue the antithyroid drugs and watch closely during pregnancies.
Member Comments (6)

by Lake Lover, May 25, 2007 12:00AM
Surgery is another option and if you have the history you have no surgeon would refuse performing a TT on you.

I was on ATD's for 4 1/2 years and had no problem finding a surgeon to do the surgery.

Find one that performs 3-4 thyroid surgeries a week to be sure you get an experienced one.

WIth a 14 months in the house and the prospect of you having more children I thing a TT would be a safer option.

It's your life and your decision.  Why risk any possable exposure of radioactivity to either your child or husband.  Three days is not enough in my opinon to guarantee no ill effects.

Insurance companies never turn down thyroid removal surgeries, per my thyroid surgeon.

I'm 2 1/2 years post op and doing great!

by NURSELPN, May 25, 2007 12:00AM
To: tanlis
Hi tanlis,

I know they say that RAI is safe & effective. I had RAI for Graves in Feb of 2005 & I have to say I haven't felt well since. I was not educated enough on my options or I would have refused any permanant solution at that time. I'm taking Armour thyroid & on almost full replacement (180mg). Three months after the RAI my TSH went from undetectable to 89 in a 1 months span. At the same time as my TSH of 89 TED started. I've had (5) eye surgeries in the past 1 1/2 years for thyroid eye disease & haven't returned to work since the fall of 2004. It seems that the RAI stopped my thyroid from reacting to the antibodies but the rest of my body has paid. I am also now having problems with increased red blood & white blood cell production. And now I wonder if the RAI has caused that. They mention leukemia as a possible side effect on some of the web sites.  

I don't even know that I would have had surgery but I would have definately taken meds as long as possible before doing anything permanant to ruin my thyroid, esp. RAI.  If I was tolerating the meds well I probably would have remained on them until the immune attack finally burned out. Hind sight is 20/20, they say.

I'm not telling you what to do. I'm just relaying my experience for what it's worth.

God Bless, TJ




by NURSELPN, May 25, 2007 12:00AM
To: tanlis
I don't mean to contradict what Dr Mark or anyone else has to say but I can only tell you my experience.

I hope things work out better for you, tanlis .  TJ

by GravesLady, May 25, 2007 12:00AM
To: tanlis
I did RAI 10 years ago and I am fine.  Know of others that had RAI even longer and they are doing fine. One women had 6 healthy children after her RAI.

We are not all alike, so not all of us suffer.

by pjgovitz, May 26, 2007 12:00AM
I had RAI 8 days ago, after researching, and talking to others, my dr, and the nuc med guys, and Dr Lupo, I decided it was the best option for me. Surgery also has it's risk, and I know my body couldn't hae handled high doses of calcium and Vitamin D, like my friend has had to do since her TT....everyone is different. Who's to say if the illnesses discovered later were there before RAI, or would've come irregardless. Also I know people who's had this done 20 and 10 years ago, their quality of life is much greater than mine before RAI. with me ATD's weren't not an option as I need synthroid anyway..

Good Luck,
Pam
Continue discussion
Expert Activity
Salmonella typhimurium outbreak sic...
9 hrs ago by Enoch Choi, MD
Can Sleep Apnea Cause Alzheimer's?...
Jan 05 by Steven Y Park, MD
Optimal Health in 2009- Happy New Y... 
Dec 31 by Lee Kirksey, MD